TrialPad: Your Path to Streamline Litigation

If I had to name the #1 priority of redesigning your law practice business model to stay competitive in today’s environment, it would be cost containment. It is THE fundamental principle in Law Practice Strategy’s trainings and consultations, as it affects every decision you make to incorporate the features of a 21st century law firm model. In LPS’s most recent webinar on Alternative Fee Arrangements, Hank Turner told us that one step in the ability to successfully “price” your legal services is to review how past matters similar in scope were priced, and determine if the process could be made “leaner” (eliminate the unnecessary in project management speak), thus reducing cost. This not only reduces the risk of underpricing your work, but also creates the potential for greater profit margins.

The primary way to contain costs is to automate anything that can be. And with the proliferation legal technology, more and more of what we do fits into that category. So let’s take a look at an awesome application that fills in a few gaps.

If you think it’s possible that a tech app can make you feel all warm and fuzzy, TrialPad is the one. Seriously. One look at this interface on an iPad, and I had a flash of wanting to return to trying cases just so I could use it and look really cool.

Appearances aside, TrialPad’s ease of use makes your tech fears disappear. When you open the application, you see something really familiar: a manila folder with your case’s name on it. You are also able to write notes on the outside of the folder by clicking edit, and a keyboard appears.  To open the folder, you tap on it. We’re good so far.

In the open case view, your documents are listed on the left sidebar, and the review pane next to it.  Organizing the documents is simple and common sense, and navigating around them  is logical and clearly apparent. Again, the functionality displays an ease of use that becomes familiar quickly.

TrialPad recently integrated with Dropbox to upload documents. The alternative is to upload adobe acrobat pdf’s via email or iTunes. Documents can be uploaded either individually or in batches. It offers standard annotation tools, and annotations are not automatically saved. This allows for ease of preparation, where you can rehearse your presentation of evidence without permanently marking the document. TrialPad also offers a redaction tool, although it is preferable if the documents is redacted before upload.

Because of its simplicity and iPad’s mobility, TrialPad works great for depositions, mediations, and arbitrations as well. But remember: just as the iPad is not a computer, so TrialPad is not TrialDirector. The functionality of TrialDirector goes well beyond what TrialPad offers (i.e., use of video, exhibit overlays, and much more), and is the software of choice for complex trials with numerous witnesses and lots of documents. Just as you need to assess when you need your laptop or when your iPad will work, so you need to determine: can you be effective with TrialPad or do you need to go big?

TrialPad’s genius is that it hits a common mid-range where it is more frequently useful. It enables you to have the technology support that will make you more efficient in many environment, and is another step you can take to streamline your practice at a cost you can afford. And remember, it’s cute.  OK, now I must go find a trial firm that needs a lawyer!

3 Responses to TrialPad: Your Path to Streamline Litigation
  1. Jorge Colón
    February 21, 2011 | 5:03 pm

    Excellent post. Thank you.

    "If I had to name the #1 priority of redesigning your law practice business model to stay competitive in today’s environment, it would be cost containment."

    Are you arguing for cost containment as a means to lower fees too?

    Jorge
    The Online Bar Association http://follr.me/Jorge

    • donnaseyle
      February 21, 2011 | 10:57 pm

      I\’m not advocating increasing or decreasing fees. What I do advocate is using pricing strategies other than billing by the hour. Often that involves using fixed pricing, which requires an analysis of many factors, on a case-by-case basis. There is no set fee for a particular kind of matter (unless you decide to adopt that model either by itself or in conjunction with a fact-based pricing process).

      Cost containment allows lawyers more freedom in pricing their work, and alleviates fears about the risks they take in agreeing to a fixed price. Clients are seeking certainty in their legal fees, and the attorney/client relationship is enhanced by an up-front agreement on the cost of a legal matter. Whether or not that agreement includes a price that could be greater or less than what the attorney would earn by an hourly billing arrangement really should not be a consideration. An agreed-upon price should be something both the attorney & client believes is fair. That process can be easier when the attorney has control of his/her costs.

  2. @litigationtech
    February 21, 2011 | 7:05 pm

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts on TrialPad, Donna, and for noting the iPad v. computer and TrialPad v. TrialDirector comparison. Like you, I hope that someone has a reason to require an iPad for trial, and calls me in to assist. It could happen…
    Enhanced versions of reviews of three new iPad apps for trial presentation, which first appeared on Law.com may be found at http://trial-technology.blogspot.com/2011/01/appl… and http://trial-technology.blogspot.com/2011/02/exhi….
    Each has its merits, all are similar, yet they differ to some degree. There are several screen-shots of each.

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree Plugin

Trackback URL http://lawpracticestrategy.com/legal-technology-your-path-cost-containment/trackback/